Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #22 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> 2011-12-08 15:32:31 EST
---
+: OK
-: must be fixed
=: should be fixed (at your discretion)
?: Question or clairification needed
N: not applicable
MUST:
[+] rpmlint output: Good
[+] follows package naming guidelines
[+] spec file base name matches package name
[+] package meets the packaging guidelines
[+] package uses a Fedora approved license: GPLv3
[+] license field matches the actual license: Actual source is GPLv3.
[+] license file is included in %doc: LICENSE
[+] spec file is in American English
[+] spec file is legible
[+] sources match upstream: md5sum matches (b11447108c0cc0e2eb1cd249693bcde7)
[+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested F15 x86_64
[N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch
[+] all build requirements in BuildRequires
[N] spec file handles locales properly
[N] ldconfig in %post and %postun
[+] no bundled copies of system libraries
[N] no relocatable packages
[+] package owns all directories that it creates
[+] no files listed twice in %files
[+] proper permissions on files
[+] consistent use of macros
[+] code or permissible content
[N] large documentation in -doc
[N] no runtime dependencies in %doc
[N] header files in -devel
[N] static libraries in -static
[N] .so in -devel
[N] -devel requires main package
[+] package contains no libtool archives
[+] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate
[+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages
[+] all filenames in UTF-8
SHOULD:
[+] query upstream for license text
[N] description and summary contains available translations
[+] package builds in mock
[+] package builds on all supported arches: Tested x86_64
[+] package functions as described:
[+] sane scriptlets
[+] subpackages require the main package
[N] placement of pkgconfig files
[N] file dependencies versus package dependencies
[+] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.