https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887621
--- Comment #22 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel(a)michel-slm.name> ---
(In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #20)
(In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #18)
> folly.x86_64: W: no-documentation
> folly-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
FYI we do have documentation (under folly/docs, see
https://github.com/facebook/folly/tree/
2fa292ded20bb83383c010974bb7796b2832a84d/folly/docs). We should add a BR on
pandoc and build and ship this (possibly in its own subpackage).
I missed this from our discussion, thanks for the reminder
(In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #21)
> - No tests ran
Make '%check' section conditional, please.
Good point. It was not failing anyway but a bit misleading and a waste of time
to invoke %ctest when we know it will be a no-op
The review is complete. Package approved.
Thanks so much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component