Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2010-01-15 08:52:25 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #1)
> - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM.
> perl-IO-stringy.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
> /usr/share/doc/perl-IO-stringy-2.110/examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis
> perl-IO-stringy.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
> /usr/share/doc/perl-IO-stringy-2.110/examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis /usr/bin/perl
...
> 3) Fix rpmlint message by adding following to %prep
> chmod 644 examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis
The rpmlint warnings don't really need fixing; having the example executable
makes it easier to try, and the /usr/bin/perl dependency isn't adding anything
that isn't already required by the package.
Just thought lets keep rpmlint silent. And yes I agree keeping it executable is
easier to try.
Thanks for committing the changes. But Just wonder do you see macros in SPEC
are more recommended for perl packages?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.