Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487312
Phil Knirsch <pknirsch(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(pknirsch(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #4 from Phil Knirsch <pknirsch(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-26 12:43:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
MUST Items
----------
[OK] Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[OK] The spec file name must match the base package.
[FAIL/INFO] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
FAIL: The description is not more than the summary. Please add some more
information maybe on how it is working or how it should be used.
INFO: There is a README and README.txt. What is the difference?
Extended the description of both the main and the utils package to contain more
useful information about the packages.
Also renamed the README.txt to DESIGN.txt as it is a rough draft of the design
of the tuned.
SHOULD Items
------------
[OK] License file included.
[BAD] No translations for Non-English languages.
Will come in a future version.
[BAD] Package functions as described: Not enough information for
this.
Extended the README and the tuned manpage, added a tuned.conf manpage and added
a README.utils that describes in detail what the systemtap scripts do.
Thanks a lot for the review so far!
Regards, Phil
New packages are now up:
Spec URL:
http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned.spec
SRPM URL:
http://pknirsch.fedorapeople.org/src/tuned-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.