https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876317
--- Comment #6 from Eduardo Echeverria <echevemaster(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #2)
> Actually I think it would be better for you do a tarball, also have to
> provide the license text in a single file :)
I guess I can. But there is no upstream tarball -- this _is_ the source
distribution. Hmmm; there's also a license ambiguity, as the web site
clearly says Apache 2.0 but the code itself is an MIT-style license.
> Please remove the macro %defattr from %files, can give the appropriate
> permissions in %prep
Yep. Old habits die hard. :)
Hi Mathew
You should contact upstream to include the license,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
In this case, you must document how to generate the tarball in the spec
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
> And remove rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT from %install, is obsolete, and is only
> used if the package is for EPEL5
That I think I'll keep, because I see no reason this wouldn't be useful in
EPEL5.
In this case should follow the guidelines for EPEL5
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Distribution_sp...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.