https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160
--- Comment #8 from Olivier Lemasle <o.lemasle(a)gmail.com> ---
Thanks for the reviews Jerry, and thanks Fabio for the comments.
- Regarding the license, you may have seen that I actually asked for
clarification in the fedora-legal thread you mentioned. Actually, I remember I
used "ASL 2.0 with exceptions" on other packages I maintain, after Neal
Gompa's
message telling "ASL 2.0 with exceptions" is sufficient and should
"probably"
be added to the list of valid licenses. However, I did not see the last replies
on the thread at the time, so I've changed to simply "ASL 2.0 or MIT".
- I've also remove the codes of conduct, as they're indeed not documentation
for the package.
Package updated:
Spec URL:
https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-linux-raw-sys.spec
SRPM URL:
https://olem.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-linux-raw-sys-0.0.28-1.fc35.sr...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983160