Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
--- Comment #15 from Chen Lei <supercyper(a)163.com> 2010-03-11 00:58:52 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Here's the updated 0.9.0 version:
> > Spec URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec
> > SRPM URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm
> > I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would be
best
> > to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are
a bit ambiguous and
> > potentially conflicting.
> > I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from
fedora
> > review people on that.
>
> Please do not add utils to main package, it'll lead to multilib conflict.
How will it lead to a multilib conflict? Its fine to install both the 32 and 64
bit binaries and libraries and run/use either.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.