https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |praiskup(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(a)redhat.com> ---
Per Fedora guidelines, we can not use /opt in general, you could technically
request a FPC exception for /etc/fedora sub-directory:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_limited_usage...
The "Open Source" license mentioned in the License tag isn't in:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Software_Licen...
I can confirm that the script in %install section is pretty complicated,
having a list of wildcards in %files would sound much safer.
Actually SGXSDK is package just for developers.
But several files are installed into the default library path /usr/lib64,
unversioned. These are typically needed at runtime, or should these be
installed elsewhere? Typically, /usr/lib64 is for users (runtime), not
developers (build time).
/usr/lib64/libsgx_quote_ex_sim.so
/usr/lib64/libsgx_launch_sim.so
/usr/lib64/libsgx_epid_sim.so
/usr/lib64/libsgx_urts_sim.so
/usr/lib64/libsgx_uae_service_sim.so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444