https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668010
--- Comment #8 from Felix Schwarz <fschwarz(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Hi Tom,
seems like nobody is willing to review this... Anyway we had a ROCm 2.4 release
recently while this package is still based on ROCm 2.0. Do you think it will be
useful to upgrade this package before a full review or is that just unnecessary
churn?
Regarding the "clara" bundling I think this is needed as per Fedora's
packaging
policy (
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling ).
See also:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
I still need some time to clean up some other Fedora package (borgbackup, bug
1669083) but I plan to go through this package afterwards (and will probably
nudge a few people to either review my notes or do the formal review). I'm
really looking forward to having the ROCm stack available on Fedora easily.
(Usual disclaimer: If someone else is ready to review this please just do.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component