https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109340
--- Comment #3 from Carl George 🤠 <carl(a)redhat.com> ---
a) Should architecture specific builds be available? For example
using Neon, SSE2 and AVX instructions.
How would that even work? My understand is those optimizations are enabled by
default, and I see no reason to disable them.
b) Can RE Flex
https://github.com/Genivia/RE-flex be packaged
separately, rather than bundled? It seems to be an improvement over Flex
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/flex/flex/
Reflex can be packaged separately, but according to upstream not as a shared
library that ugrep can link against.
https://github.com/Genivia/ugrep/issues/215
I have this link as a comment above the bundled provides in my local spec file,
but didn't have it in the spec file at the time of the copr build. I will
include that comment when importing.
The packages in that copr do not contain a shared library. The RE-flex package
contains the reflex command and man page. The RE-flex-devel package contains
header files and static libraries (*.a). The packaging guidelines state that
static libraries should not be shipped.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-stat...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109340