https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586324
--- Comment #7 from Pablo Rodríguez <fedora(a)pragmata.tk> ---
(In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #4)
(In reply to Pablo Rodríguez from comment #2)
> Just a question about the name: why not python-mupdf?
>
> I mean, they are Python bindings for MuPDF.
Yes...package naming is somewhat of a judgement call. Fedora guidelines
suggest sticking with the upstream name, so that is what I did. See also
the example there for PyQT4.
I didn’t know that. The naming is fine.
I could also see an argument for calling the
package fitz as that's the actual module name (not sure why). I think I'll
just stick with what I've done as that was what Robert approved.
See
https://pymupdf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/intro/#note-on-the-name-fitz.
Many thanks for your help and your excellent work,
Pablo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component