https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
Issues:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Apache
(v2.0)",
"Unknown or generated". 27 files have unknown license. Detailed output
of licensecheck in /home/gil/1379094-python-flit/licensecheck.txt
flit-0.9/flit/logo.py under ASL 2.0 license
flit-0.9/flit/upload.py under PSF license
Most of the sources file are devoid of this information.
Please, contact upstream and ask to confirm the licensing of code and/or
content/s, and add license headers
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging...
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
flit-0.9/flit/logo.py
flit-0.9/flit/upload.py
Please, add: "Provides: bundled(foo) = fooversion"
NON bloccking issues:
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
Available: 0.9
Please, fix also these rpmlint problem:
python3-flit.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subpackages -> sub
packages, sub-packages, prepackages
python3-flit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary flit
python-flit.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subpackages -> sub
packages, sub-packages, prepackages
python-flit.src:35: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 35, tab: line
9)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component