https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Aurelien Bompard from comment #5)
Sorry for taking so long to reply. Indeed the mailman 2.x package is
going
to stop working in Fedora pretty soon, with the end of Python 2, so it would
make sense to rename mailman to mailman2 and mailman3 to mailman.
I started with mailman3 because of EPEL, I expect mailman2 to be available
there for a while. Plus since it's a new package, it's easier to not have it
depend on the renaming of another already included package. Let's review
this one first, make sure it's correct according to the guidelines, and
discuss with the mailman2 maintainer what we want to do then. Would that
work for you? Suggestions?
Sounds good to me. We'd probably want to prepare a Self-Contained Change to
switch mailman package to mailman 3 for Fedora 30.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component