https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928
Artem <ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(ego.cordatus@gmai |
|l.com) |
--- Comment #11 from Artem <ego.cordatus(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
Why are you arbitrarily inventing an "elementary-" prefix
for the package
name?
Because there is already exist 'planner' package
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/planner
Also there is no any special Elementary guidelines in Fedora and how elementary
packages MUST named.
And why are you arbitrarily building this with -flto?
Why you not ask why arbitrarily mozjs [1] and firefox built with -flto and why
LTO by default proposed in F32 [2]?
Packages should be built with fedora default build flags ...
This package built with default fedora build flags. Additional build flags not
prohibited, i asked this many times other maintainers.
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mozjs68/blob/master/f/mozjs68.spec#_3
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component