--- Comment #11 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #10)
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> No, the packager does not need to repeat the %license thing if the license
> file is already part of --licensefiles.
>
> There is no rule nor recommendation to have licenses in
> /usr/share/licenses/, the only rule is to make them with %license and
> %pyproject_save_files already does that, if upstream has the correct
> metadata.
>
> See
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
> #_example_spec_file and look up %license.
This comes up a *lot*. I’d like to propose that we explicitly clarify this
point in the Licensing Guidelines, but I haven’t yet figured out how to word
it without making the relevant section too verbose and meandering.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.