https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033
--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net> ---
Static libs moved to separate -static package. -devel depends on it.
That is not what the guidelines suggest. Just think about it a bit. Such a
dependency defeats the purpose of moving the static libs into a _separate_
package.
Added --disable-rpath to %configure anyway.
That's a no-op, if the configure script doesn't support that option [yet]:
| configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-rpath
%files
...
%{_datadir}/ucx
%exclude %{_datadir}/ucx/examples
%{_datadir}/ucx/perftest
The first line in the quote above includes the complete %_datadir/ucx/ tree
already minus the excluded directory. Hence the last line is superfluous.
Just want to have issues in spec fixed before creating actual
release.
Can we ignore this one for a while?
You only need to keep in mind that replacing the source tarball with another
release could be a rather disruptive step during review.
Btw, the build.log contains several warnings about libraries and tools
(doxygen!) it cannot find.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component