Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074
--- Comment #44 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac(a)gmail.com> 2008-11-29 04:42:56
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #42)
I haven't seen discussed why upstream only provides a static
library instead of
a Shared Object ?
Some people still prefer static libraries.
Which Package will use this one (does a runtime test was done) ?
All the examples have been run.
There is no needs to export CFLAGS before the %configure macro (as
already done
within the %configure).
Agreed, but this is just redundant.
Headers got installed in /usr/include which is the standard path.
Does someone
checked if there is possible namespace issue ?
All the identifiers in the includes have prefixes, such as dd_ , ddd_ , ddf_
Very unlike they will conflict with anything else.
Also, headers should have been installed using install -p to prevent
timestramp
changes.
What headers?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.