https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161003
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> ---
[ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing
breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
One last thing that needs to be fixed.
You can see how others did the "licensing breakdown"
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bitwise/blob/rawhide/f/bitwise.spec
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/river/blob/rawhide/f/river.spec
It will be a +1 after that. So there is a topic that I would like to bring
forward.
Since this would be your first Fedora package, you will need to get
sponsored into the `packager' group before this package can be
accepted.
I would like to sponsor you.
That would make it my responsibility to guide you through the processes that
you will do, and the tools that you will need as a package maintainer. I
would also be there to answer your packaging-related questions, or to
help you find somebody who knows the answers.
Your responsibilities as a future package maintainer are explained here
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_maintainer_responsibil...
To make sure a person is able to fulfill the package maintainer
responsibilities, we usually stick to this process
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#requi...
I am sending you an email with some follow-up information and my
contact information. But for the sake of full transparency, there are
also other packager sponsors, so you can reach out to them if you
prefer to do so. They might be busy though.
https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-sponsors/active
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161003