https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552
--- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
---
Please post both spec and srpm URL each time you make a revision.
Issues found in current revision:
%install
[...]
cp %{S:1} %{S:2} %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name}
please use either cp -p or install -p here.
(
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps)
Could you take a look at the test suite output? It's showing diffs, but there
are apparently only whitespace differences because as far as I can tell all the
numbers are the same.
Please fix this rpmlint warning:
exodusii-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on exodusii/exodusii-libs/libexodusii
This is actually mandated by the guidelines
(
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package).
-doc subpackage should be noarch (BuildArch: noarch).
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5.so.10
exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5_hl.so.10
exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libz.so.1
exodusii.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libnetcdf.so.11
exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5.so.10
exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5_hl.so.10
exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libz.so.1
exodusii-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on exodusii/exodusii-libs/libexodusii
It looks like the libraries are linked to libhdf5 and libhdf5_hl unnecessarily.
That is, they don't seem to reference any symbols from libhdf5*. Please verify
and fix if necessary.
README is packaged twice (once in main package and second time in -doc).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component