Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-10-21 11:58 EST
-------
(In reply to comment #11)
Some more comments:
* tideEditor needs to have a variable HFILE_PATH set (I guess for
harmonic files localization?). So it certainly requires an /etc/profile.d
file.
it also certainly requires a .desktop and icon.
profile files and desktop files are useless for tideEditor because:
* HFILE_PATH should be under wher user has write access (For example,
HFILE_PATH=/usr/share/xtide/harminocs-????.tcd tideEditor
immediately exits).
* tideEditor surely requires HFILE_PATH environ. With no HFILE_PATH
environ, this cannot be launched.
* xttpd certainly would benefit from an init script. Regarding xttpd,
could
you please look at some basic security issues, like which user the daemon
runs at. It would certainly make sense to put xttpd in another package, it
is really a different beast from xtide.
Currently I am checking debian's script.
(In reply to comment #12)
> Well, before fixing this, will you tell me how do you think of
> A. libtcd and tcd-utils release numbering (0<->1)
libtcd 0., tcd-utils directly the release number
Well, when I directly use release number, i.e.
tcd-utils: 1.3.7-1 2 3 4 5 ...
xtide versioning become
2.9-dev 0.1.dev 0.2.dev.. 0.3.dev.. 0.4.dev..
(then formal release) 5 (suddenly jump)
> B. libtcd.so share object loading problem
It works when doing things by hand, I'll try a rpmbuild.
I will try preload
> C. soname versioning
Begin with 0 for soname and 0.0.0 for library.
Well, for now I will apply this.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.