https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #3 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan(a)club.fr> ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
Per your strategy, will there come llvm3.4, llvm3.5 in the future?
Because
LLVM API is never stable.
Well, it really depends on how Fedora's and
Julia's schedules interact in the
future. With some luck, when a new Fedora release goes out, Julia will happen
to use the latest LLVM version, and we won't need a versioned llvm package. But
OTOH when backporting a new LLVM version to a published Fedora release, it's
likely that Julia will break as there will likely be some lag between LLVM's
and Julia's releases. With an unstable API like LLVM's, versioned
parallel-installable packages are kind of inevitable.
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #2)
Does Julia upstream have any plans to move to llvm-3.4 btw?
Yes, the next version will use LLVM 3.5. (Support for 3.4 is almost present
already, but there are a few bugs and it has not been tested thoroughly enough
that the developers feel confident to use it now.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component