https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng <i(a)cicku.me> ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #3)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> Per your strategy, will there come llvm3.4, llvm3.5 in the future? Because
> LLVM API is never stable.
Well, it really depends on how Fedora's and Julia's schedules interact in
the future.
It depends on Julia itself, actually.
But OTOH when backporting a new LLVM version to a published Fedora
release, it's likely that Julia will break as there will likely be some lag
between LLVM's and Julia's releases.
I don't think you need to update julia for each Fedora release, we need to keep
something stable.
With an unstable API like LLVM's,
versioned parallel-installable packages are kind of inevitable.
Still not a good reason. If something can't be considered stable, you'd better
package it in copr first.
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #2)
> Does Julia upstream have any plans to move to llvm-3.4 btw?
Yes, the next version will use LLVM 3.5. (Support for 3.4 is almost present
already, but there are a few bugs and it has not been tested thoroughly
enough that the developers feel confident to use it now.)
Oh, so llvm3.5 will appear in review queue again? What about 3.6, 3.7, 3.8
etc.?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component