Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522394
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> 2009-09-10 10:22:43 EDT
---
X please add a comment for the patch (the patch itself seems fine)
X license seems to be ASL 2.0 for the plugin but parts contained (some .js
files) are GPL v2 and GPL v2+. Please reflect this in the license field.
X please add your real name to the changelog
- naming fine
- builds fine
- %files fine
- macros fine
- Requires good
- sources match upstream
- rpmlint fine:
$ rpmlint
/home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-cobertura-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint
/home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-cobertura-2.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm
maven-plugin-cobertura.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint
/home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-cobertura-javadoc-2.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.