https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862460
--- Comment #2 from Matej Grabovsky <mgrabovs(a)redhat.com> ---
Thanks for the review, Andy. See below for links to updated spec file and SRPM.
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1)
Is both a %modname and a %srcname required? I've seen only
%srcname in
Python package SPECs.
I've removed %modname and kept %srcname only.
You can probably use the %{expand:} macro like so:
%global _description %{expand:
A collection of cache libraries with a common API.
Extracted from Werkzeug.}
That way you don't have to add backslashes.
I found the description to be short enough to bear two backslashes previously,
but now I've rewritten it with the macro.
Does the package have any tests worth adding to the %check phase?
Unfortunately, it does not. There were some tests in the original Werkzeug, but
they were not migrated with the rest of the code.
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mgrabovs/cachelib/fedora-...
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mgrabovs/cachelib/fedora-...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component