Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526122
--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2009-10-08 16:23:49 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #4)
[!] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
it is the second one from the top, and is a valid option. (I used vim's rpm
spec file template, which uses that option.)
[!] Permissions on files are set properly.
This refers to file permissions: the owner, group and the file mask must be
correct.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions
There are no executables, and all files are owned by root:root with 644
permissions. So this is OK.
[!] Latest version is packaged.
[!] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
my problems: ;)
* are the permissions correctly set with 'cp -a'? cp -a preserves all
timestamps and permissions if they are correctly set in the sources. In this
case, they are. But does this count as 'properly set'?
Yes, it does.
**
New release at
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vim-latex.spec
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/vim-latex-1.5-2.20091002...
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.