https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631981
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Downstream_.so_name_v...
In cases where upstream ships unversioned .so library (so this is not needed
for plugins, drivers, etc.), the packager MUST try to convince upstream to
start versioning it.
If that fails due to unwilling or unresposive upstream, the packager may start
versioning downstream but this must be done with caution and ideally only in
rare cases. We don't want to create a library that could conflict with upstream
if they later start providing versioned shared libraries. Under no
circumstances should the unversioned library be shipped in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component