Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203(a)freenet.de> 2009-07-03 10:42:45 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > > That said, I am not sure, this package should enter
Fedora.
> >
> > Why?
> Fedora's mission is to be a "leading edge distro", not a
"bleeding edge"
> distro, consisting of more or less non-functional, immature packages.
>
> IMO, this package is not unlikely of the latter kind.
That is your opinion, not mine or others I've spoken to, its not a topic for a
bug report.
A package's maturity/quality is topic within a review.
But its a much used method within packages.
Yes, these packages
and your specs are of low quality.
Packaging guidelines discussions are for the mailing
list.
Free free to continue shipping these apparently dysfunctional low quality
packages.
My advise to reviewers: Do not approve this package in this current shape.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.