https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1891646
--- Comment #3 from Scott Talbert <swt(a)techie.net> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
Should the license be (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and (GPLv3+ with exceptions)
to avoid
ambiguity?
Yes. Good point.
I'd call it python3-sip5. Not sipbuild, but sip, because the
Python package
is called sip. Consider at least providing it (via %py_provides
python3-sip5).
The source and binary package or just the binary package? I can see an
argument for that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component