https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #12)
The Haskell compiler has done the same recently with LLVM 3.4, for
the very
same reason:
Yeah I we probably need llvm35 too for ghc-7.10
Jens, Mukundan: could you comment on your experience with packaging
llvm3.4?
Once you have llvm34.spec it should be pretty trivial to tweak it to llvm33.
You can give it a try locally first. :)
You can't see llvm34? (comment 11)
(I still vote for calling this llvm33;)
Are there any other packages with '.' in their name (without a '-')?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component