https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586324
--- Comment #4 from Scott Talbert <swt(a)techie.net> ---
(In reply to Pablo Rodríguez from comment #2)
Just a question about the name: why not python-mupdf?
I mean, they are Python bindings for MuPDF.
Yes...package naming is somewhat of a judgement call. Fedora guidelines[1]
suggest sticking with the upstream name, so that is what I did. See also the
example there for PyQT4. I could also see an argument for calling the package
fitz as that's the actual module name (not sure why). I think I'll just stick
with what I've done as that was what Robert approved.
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidel...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component