https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932616
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
Thanks for spotting this issue. I've fixed locally.
The packaging guideline enforces the name of the source package to be the same
as the archive name. But it's possible for a library only binary package to use
lib prefix (and libfoo-devel for the related -devel package).
rpm -qi librttr will give you hint about which source package this librtt
binary package was created from.
I've found curl package that already follow this convention. (using libcurl and
libcurl-devel). So I don't think this break assumption.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component