https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871037
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I will think about this. Before I need more knowledges about this
posibilites. So I built a library with only thats requires which I enough
good understand.
Sure, I understand.
Thanks! I will forward this to upstream.
Let's patch the bug for Fedora, also, so Fedora users don't suffer its
(admittedly unknown) consequences.
> Third, the unused direct shared library dependency warnings from
rpmlint can
> be eliminated by adding this to the %configure line:
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed $RPM_LD_FLAGS".
Hm...
I don't understand your reply. I actually did a build with the modified
%configure line I proposed, and it worked fine. Eliminating unused library
links is a good thing; for example, it reduces address space pressure on 32-bit
builds.
> Fourth, another option for the Source0 download URL is Source0:
>
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rusxmms/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 (see
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net). (I'm
> not saying you have to switch, just that sourceforge is a known quantity
> when it comes to downloads.)
Sourceforge hasn't librcc-0.2.9.tar.gz so I use
dside.dyndns.org.
I will request to an author to use sourceforge for all sources.
This works for me:
$ wget
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/rusxmms/librcc-0.2.9.tar.bz2
So it looks like librcc-0.2.9.tar.bz2 is already there.
(In reply to comment #6)
So do you approve the package?
I would first like to see a modified spec file with (a) a patch for the
off-by-one error, and (b) unused direct dependencies on shared libraries
eliminated (whether using -Wl,--as-needed or some other mechanism).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.