https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924
--- Comment #22 from Steven Jay Munroe <munroesj52(a)gmail.com> ---
So here is a cleaner build on COPR using the latest master with a temporary tag
v1.0.2y.
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/munroesj52/pveclib/fedora...
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/munroesj52/pveclib/fedora...
Turns out the build process is really picked about all the version #s matching.
And having pveclib.spec in the source tree is a mistake.
Now the rpmlint is clean expect the spelling of altivec.h:
$ rpmlint ./rpmbuild/
pveclib.ppc64le: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US altivec -> elective
pveclib.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US altivec -> elective
6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
one weird thing is that the RPMS built by COPR have bad signatures
Error checking signature of
/home/sjmunroe/rpmtest/pveclib-debuginfo-1.0.2y-1.fc30.ppc64le.rpm:
/home/sjmunroe/rpmtest/pveclib-debuginfo-1.0.2y-1.fc30.ppc64le.rpm: digests
SIGNATURES NOT OK
rpm -ql complains: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 81dc7181: NOKEY
But the ones I build on Fedora 30 P8 does NOT have these errors.
I have no idea what this is oe how to deal with this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component