Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #32 from Tim Fenn <fenn(a)stanford.edu> 2009-07-26 21:49:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > apbs has support for:
> > --with-mpich=PATH toplevel MPICH directory
> > --with-mpich2=PATH toplevel MPICH2 directory
> > --with-lam=PATH toplevel LAM-MPI directory
> > --with-openmpi enable OpenMPI compilation
> > so I suggest you add these to the package in the future.
> >
>
> Will do.
Just no hurry - wait until the two drafts become guidelines :)
Right!
> This works, but the resulting examples take ~4hrs to run on my
AMD opteron 275.
> I can cut it down to a 1-2 of the examples...
Ugh. Do they give an error code if the result is not the wanted one..?
You could probably just drop the %check phase.
There is no error code, it just prints out that the result was not within the
given error tolerance.
I just took out the %check.
Package does not build:
RPM build errors:
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/apbs-1.1.0-5.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/ApbsClient.pyc
File not found:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/apbs-1.1.0-5.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/ApbsClient.pyo
This is due to RPM in Fedora 11 not byte compiling files in %{_bindir}. Instead
of %exclude you could just delete the files after %install with rm -f which
doesn't complain about possible non-existing files.
I just removed the %exclude statement and built using F11 (since I won't be
packaging this for F10 anyway).
Spec URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-1.1.0-6.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.