https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
--- Comment #37 from Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com> ---
2. split the source package into systemd-boot-x86_64 and
systemd-boot-aarch64, and
make the packages BuildArch:noarch. systemd-boot-x86_64 would build
systemd-boot-x64.noarch,
systemd-boot-ia32.noarch, and systemd-boot-aarch64 would build
systemd-boot-aarch64.noarch.
The problem is that the builds would fail if scheduled on the wrong
architecture,
i.e. we'd need to cancel and repeat the builds until the right arch of
builder is
encountered. This would be fairly terrible.
Well. You can have a systemd-boot-x86_64.srpm package which is
exclusivearch x86_64 and produces an empty main package plus a
systemd-boot-unsigned-x64.noarch subpackage.
Ideally you would have a single systemd-boot.srpm which produces
systemd-boot-unsigned-x64.noarch when compiled on x86_64 and
systemd-boot-unsigned-aa64.noarch when compiled on aarch64, but
IIRC that works on RHEL only. One of the annonying build system
differences between rhel and fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784