https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166288
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
b) Can a comment be added in the spec file on why the source for the
tests need to be packaged?
Tests are packaged in order to be able to run them later against the installed
library. They will be exhibited in gating tests. I don't think this needs to be
specifically documented in the spec file. There is already %description which
explains what the package contains and how to use it.
c) Should upstream add a copy of GPL license as well?
Upstream
think it's a copy-and-paste mistake. Next release will probably change
the license to LGPL. <
https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/icecast-libigloo/-/issues/6>
d) Thanks for detailed license breakdown. The license field for the
main package only contains LGPL2. Should other licenses be added?
License tag always
describes a content of the binary RPM package. The main
binary package does not include non-LGPL files. Hence it cannot list other
licenses. Compare to tests subpackage which contains tests/prng.c file, hence
it lists GPL-2.0-only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166288