https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127693
--- Comment #6 from Benson Muite <benson_muite(a)emailplus.org> ---
> b) Can source1 be linked explicitly, it has a tag
https://github.com/hashie/hashie/tags ?
I am following established precedent observed in about 30-ish previously built rubygems.
This is explicitly archiving only the spec directory.
Ok.
> c) there are font files which should be packaged separately
> Lato-LightItalic.ttf Lato-RegularItalic.ttf SourceCodePro-Bold.ttf
> Lato-Light.ttf Lato-Regular.ttf SourceCodePro-Regular.ttf
> Corresponding packages
>
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/lato-fonts/lato-fonts/
>
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/adobe-source-code-pro-fonts/adobe...
> Can make these packages dependencies and add softlinks at
usr/share/gems/doc/hashie-5.0.0/rdoc/fonts
I am following established precedent observed in about 30-ish previously build rubygems.
I have searched
the ruby-devel lists[1] and this ticket[2] was mentioned. The consensus was to keep the
status quo due
to the amount of re-work that would need to be done. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I expect adding a
softlink will work. Build as normal, require the appropriate
font packages, remove the bundled ttf
files, replace the font files with softlinks. This does not seem like it should
be problematic to continue going
forward, but let me know if I am wrong. I can reopen the ticket if helpful.
> d) Not sure why one still gets the warning [!]: When checking
ruby code, install the ruby plugin.
This might be due to fedora-review missing the ruby plugin. You can install
fedora-review-plugin-ruby
and that should clear the warning.
Thankyou.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127693