https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196598
Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pemensik(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> ---
Would it make more sense to review new packages for OLD versions for backward
compatibility, maybe shipping just limited set of libraries with different ABI?
And to update original gpsd package to recent version, matching its own version
in Fedora rawhide? The new package could provide just minimal support to work
with older clients relying on old ABI.
I think using gpsd<version> is more common than -latest suffix. I expect we
usually have packages without version with the more recent version and only
backward compatibility include version. At least it were this way with openssl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2196598