https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098398
Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?
| |needinfo?(benson_muite@emai
| |lplus.org)
--- Comment #9 from Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias(a)gmail.com> ---
How do I obtain a sponsor for this - maybe R.Dieter, sbcl package maintainer ?
Perhaps you could contact him & ask ?
Please, Fedora Package Maintainer, consider adding picolisp to Fedora !
Debian / Ubuntu / Termux / BSD has had pil / picolisp for years !
It is a tiny, highly efficient, robust & pragmatic programming language
and pure LISP interpreter, a super-shell, with some very advanced
Prolog-Like and Database and HTML/HTTP processing features .
'pil' is what I use mainly nowadays in preference to bash / perl / python
scripts,
'sbcl' is what I'd use for larger more modular 'compilation oriented'
projects,
in preference
to Java / Scala,
but I'd use both primarily as users of C/C++ libraries I develop and load with
'dlopen(3)'
into running pil or sbcl images, or in the case of 'pil', as a loadable DSO
built-in named '𝞴' which
uses dlopen(3) to load /usr/share/picolisp/bin/picolisp.so, and then calls
'lisp_eval' ,
handler of picolisp expressions , and prints the result as a string, as a bash
(Bourne Again Shell)
built-in loadable shared object (DSO).
Both have excellent FFI (foreign function interface) facilities.
See :
https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:PicoLisp#:~:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098398
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...