https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962251
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |petersen(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Dan Callaghan from comment #3)
Well, I cleaned out some comments/whitespace because I figured I
would be
maintaining the spec by hand, since cabal-rpm got the description, summary,
and BuildRequires wrong. Is there a better way?
I assume you mean "xml2-devel"? Yeah I am planning to improve that.
Eventually I would also like cabal-rpm to support updating of packages
but that is a bit more complicated.
For now you can use cabal-rpm-diff (cblrpm-diff) to compare your
spec file to what cblrpm would generate. So yeah it is a manual
process - I usually use a merge tool to merge changes from .spec.cblrpm
to .spec. But removing the comments just adds to the diff. :)
We generally try to stay close to the cblrpm output.
Suggestions for improving the Summary and Description output
are welcome - in this case not sure how cblrpm could do better. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AacQohXsOV&a=cc_unsubscribe