https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #68 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Michal Vala from comment #67)
>
> Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with
> classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self
> requires we are done here. Can you publish one more spec+srpm (eventually
> also with scratch) which we can test?
>
.build-id is clarified by Fabio Valentini and self requires seems to be
correct in latest state.
Jonny: Can you please add requires java/java-devel and I suggest licenses as
GPL2 with classpath exception + BSD for fxpackager?
If no-one has any other comments and you include these changes, I'll approve
this review.
Thanks!
You should/must use the "%mvn_install" macro
https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/index.html#gradle
e.g. %mvn_install -J build/sdk/docs/api
see
https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/index.html#mvn_file to configure
the proper JARs install location.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component