Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887611
--- Comment #8 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Thanks for your feedback, which is reflected in an updated version:
Spec URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~bubeck/vdr-vnsiserver.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~bubeck/vdr-vnsiserver-0.9.0-0.2.
20130104git04258ed894.fc17.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #6)
> Some other drive-by comments:
> - As Mathias says, it's better to offer to trade reviews than to just ask
> for one.
What do you mean? Should I offer to review someone elses packages if he
reviews mine? Am I allowed to review other peoples packages?
Since you ask, and since I cannot find you in the packagers group: it looks
like you not are sponsored. If so, you need to add FE_NEEDSPONSOR to the list
of Blocks: bugs above, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process.
If so, it also means that you cannot trade reviews and that this package must
be reviewed by someone who can sponsor you. Unfortunately, I'm no such person.
I am only packaging the vdr-vnsiserver. The git repository holds many
more
plugins and addons and the DLL and binary files from comment #2. After
getting the feedback I only package a subfolder of the git repository
because I did not need the others at all. Therefore, they are not part of
the Source0 anymore. For a description on how to prepare the Source0, see
the comments in the specfile.
Which is perfectly fine, but deserved an explanation :) Perhaps it would have
been easier to use the complete tarball and remove everything besides the
subdir used in %prep, but it's more a question of personal preferences IMHO.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FUXt0l27wB&a=cc_unsubscribe