https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034523
--- Comment #10 from Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Kashyap Chamarthy from comment #9)
(In reply to Lars Kellogg-Stedman from comment #8)
> Kashyap: As we had discussed on IRC, I think most of the points in comment
> #6 were addressed weeks ago.
I just remembered, assuming the below is the latest SPEC
https://raw.github.com/larsks-packages/sqlcli/review/sqlcli-2-2/sqlcli.spec
these two points are still valid :)
(1) s/GPLv3/GPLv3+ # This you agreed to on IRC, as an upstream author.
(2) LICENSE file not included
====
$ ls sqlcli
BUILD dependencies licensecheck.txt review-env.sh rpmlint.txt srpm
upstream
build.log files.dir results review.txt rpms-unpacked
srpm-unpacked upstream-unpacked
$ tree sqlcli | grep LICENSE
$ echo $?
1
====
Are you sure you're testing against the
> updated package sources? See comment #4; you'll note that rpmlint only
> throws the "sqlcli.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sqlcli" warning
> against this spec file.
Lars, you're right - I incorrectly misremembered from our IRC conv. that
there's something waiting on your side.
I just re-ran with explicit SPEC file:
$ fedora-review --rpm-spec -n sqlcli-2-2.fc19.src.rpm
And, yes:
$ grep "rpmlint\ sqlcli" /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SRPMS/sqlcli/review.txt -A4
# rpmlint sqlcli
sqlcli.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sqlcli
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Will post the manual review, sorry for this delay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component