https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945771
Brian Lane <bcl(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(zebob.m(a)gmail.com
| |)
--- Comment #8 from Brian Lane <bcl(a)redhat.com> ---
Spec URL:
https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/weldr-client/weldr-client.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bcl.fedorapeople.org/weldr-client/weldr-client-35.0-3.fc32.src.rpm
Description: Command line utility to control osbuild-composer
Fedora Account System Username: bcl
Thanks for your patience, I think this is now all cleaned up for Fedora at
least.
The rhel checks are there for RHEL9, which I hope is closer to Fedora behavior
than RHEL8 was, but I haven't had a chance to setup a VM to test it on yet so I
didn't change any of that.
I don't think cobra/doc needs to be a separate BuildRequire, it comes from the
same package as cobra. I did fix the testify modules though. In general how do
you decide what to list in BuildRequires? I was using the go.mod direct
dependencies as my guide, but obviously that doesn't match how Fedora is
packaging things.
Thanks for the explanation of the build flags, I rearranged the way I did
because the Makefile needs to also work standalone so it's better to just
duplicate things in the spec and pass them as part of GOBUILDFLAGS.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component