Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531648
--- Comment #3 from Andrew McNabb <amcnabb(a)mcnabbs.org> 2009-10-29 14:33:34 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Anyway, I think it's a disservice to users that the
setuptools package doesn't
> include easy_install.
I want to stick as close as possible to the python 2 version of the package, so
I'd suggest taking that up as a separate bug report against that package.
I actually did once, as bug #510659. The action to move easy_install from
python-setuptools to python-setuptools-devel was made in response to bug
#240707. I'll reopen my bug report and give some more detailed information,
but that really doesn't have any bearing on the python3-setuptools package.
The python3-setuptools-devel package has two files:
1) /usr/bin/easy_install-3: a 9 line script that imports and runs
pkg_resources.load_entry_point
2) /usr/lib/python3.1/site-packages/easy_install.py: a 5 line script that loads
and runs setuptools.command.easy_install.main
The actual dependency on python3-devel happens in the setuptools libraries, not
in these trivial scripts, so the python3-setuptools package is the one that
should depend on python3-devel package. This is a simple matter of incorrect
dependencies in the specfile, and the packaging guidelines make it pretty clear
that python3-setuptools needs to depend on python3-devel (or the files it
depends on need to move from python3-devel to python3).
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.