https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547757
--- Comment #4 from Brett Lentz <blentz(a)redhat.com> ---
But that's your job as a packager to package the missing
dependencies. You'll end up with broken docs, which are an integral part of the
package.
I understand your perspective. I'm willing to work on those additional packages
after this package is approved.
Because there is no requirement in the packaging guidelines that all doc and
testing dependencies "must" be met, this issue should not block this package
review.
Yes but your Python 3 package is behind a conditional, so if you
don't build with Python3, you should put the binary inside the Python 2 package.
If you read the spec, the bin is not behind the conditional. If the conditional
is not met, the bin will be included in the python2 package.
For now it is impractical because it depends on other maintainers to
do their job, but as soon as the deps are updated, you should add the tests.
Agreed. My plan is to work on the packaging for these additional dependencies
after this package review is complete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component