https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925323
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to ericedens from comment #3)
If possible, it'd be nice to stay consistent with upstream. I did
some
research, and these two reference (seem to) support using `/etc`:
- "The /etc/ directory is reserved for configuration files that are local
to the machine" on
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/
Storage_Administration_Guide/s1-filesystem-fhs.html
- "Don’t use %config or %config(noreplace) under /usr. /usr is deemed to
not contain configuration files in Fedora" on
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
The first guide predates the changes to how configuration works, and the second
guide is still correct. You would not mark this as a config file in /usr. If
you're going to make user configuration get effectively blown away on upgrade,
it's better to actually install it as a static regular file in /usr rather than
what you're doing in /etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component