https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #6 from jiri vanek <jvanek(a)redhat.com> ---
btw, there is openjfx package. Do yo mind to clarify the coexistence of those
two? I guess openjfx is, and will rewamin for jdk8, where this openjfx-11 will
be for jdk11...and up?
In that moment the weuestion arise, how to deal with those. Will you rename the
package with jdk14 and/or 17?
Also I believe your package *is* working with anything we build under
java-latest-openjdk, so you should require java >=11, but in that moment the
name is wrong.
To have it working flawlessly, we had this in openjdk8 for openjfx(8):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=20202175
That is a binding subpackage (coantains only symlinks). Is something like that
wortky for 11+?
dnf install javafx
Last metadata expiration check: 1:09:27 ago on Wed 19 Feb 2020 09:58:11 AM CET.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repo Size
================================================================================
Installing:
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx x86_64 1:1.8.0.242.b08-0.fc31 updates 34 k
Installing dependencies:
openjfx x86_64 8.0.202-8.b07.fc31 fedora 8.7 M
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install 2 Packages
Before review itself, we have to clarify the system integration. From this
point of view, you step into a self-contianed change :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component