https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121902
Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumistos(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumistos(a)gmail.com> ---
Thank you for all the replies Zbigniew, it's been very educational.
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10)
(In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #9)
> Unversioned so-files
> pyinstrument:
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyinstrument/low_level/stat_profile.cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so
You didn't mention this one, but it is another similar case: rpmlint could
check
that this path is not in the shared library search path, and avoid the
useless warning.
Or it could even hardcode that anything with /site-packages/ can be ignored.
Instead,
we emit this warning for a large subset of the ~10k python packages.
I didn't mention it, because I had already checked myself (as required):
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
Something has glitched here, because rpmlint spews a new warning:
pyinstrument.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.4.0-2
['4.4.0-3.fc39', '4.4.0-3']
I trust you are more than capable of dealing with this - if indeed it needs to
be dealt with.
The package is approved.
P.S.: I'll try to advance with input-remapper on Thursday, though realistically
it's probably going to be the weekend, work has drained both my time and my
brain.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121902