https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410
--- Comment #13 from Jens Lody <fedora(a)jenslody.de> ---
I see that it in fact happens this way, but I think the guidelines are a little
bit unclear in this case:
From
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_...
:
"Examples of packages that should explicitly provide only arch-specific
Provides: include native code libraries or plug-ins and their associated -devel
packages. Packages that should explicitly provide only arch-independent
Provides: include most stand-alone programs (in addition to all noarch
packages). Even though these programs may themselves be arch-specific, clients
that run them should not care about their arch in most cases. A package that
explicitly provides, for example, both a native code library as well as an
interpreted language interface to that library should have both arch-specific
(for clients of the native code library) and arch-independent (for clients of
the interpreted language interface) Provides:."
abcmidi only installs stand-alone programs as far as I see.
By the way after installing the package I get:
[jens@localhost ~]$ rpm -q --provides abcmidi
package abcmidi is not installed
[jens@localhost ~]$ rpm -q --provides abcMIDI
abcMIDI = 2015.08.31-1.fc22
abcMIDI(x86-64) = 2015.08.31-1.fc22
abcmidi = 2015.08.31-1.fc22
abcmidi(x86-64) = 2015.08.31-1.fc22
That looks like something does not work correctly or am I missing something ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component